Přeskočit obsah

Carbon fibre rod architecture

Summary

Four 2 mm carbon fibre rods run continuously through all five sandwich layers, forming a box-girder spine. They serve two simultaneous purposes: structural pre-tensioning that stiffens the sandwich without fasteners, and assembly alignment that registers all five layers to each other during build. Rod pre-tension is verified by acoustic ping — a correctly tensioned rod rings when tapped.


Concept

Pre-tensioning and stiffness

A stack of flat layers bolted together has inter-layer shear resistance only where the bolts engage. Between bolt positions, layers can micro-shift relative to each other under vibration and load. CF rods held in tension by the sandwich compression they create apply a distributed clamping force across the full rod length — every point along the rod resists inter-layer shear, not just the bolt positions.

This is the same principle as a pre-stressed concrete beam: the pre-compression delays the onset of tensile failure and dramatically increases effective stiffness under bending loads.

Assembly alignment

The rods pass through channels in every layer at precisely defined positions and heights. When rods are threaded through all five layers during assembly, they enforce angular and translational alignment. A misaligned layer cannot be bolted in place — the rods prevent it. This makes correct alignment the path of least resistance during assembly, not the result of careful measurement.

Box-girder geometry

Four rods at four distinct heights (+5.0, +2.0, −2.0, −5.0 mm from the sandwich centreline) form a rectangular cross-section in the YZ plane. This geometry resists bending in all directions — a single rod or two coplanar rods would resist bending in one plane but not the perpendicular plane.

The front and rear arms are inverted relative to the left and right arms, which reverses the rod height sign — this is what allows four continuous rods to pass through all five layers despite the arms approaching the X body from different directions.


Reference

Rod specification

Parameter Value
Material Carbon fibre, unidirectional or woven, round section
Diameter 2.0 mm OD
Cut length 333.0 mm
Quantity per drone 4
Mass per rod ~2.0 g
Total mass (set of 4) ~8.0 g
Supplier Carbonrods.cz (primary)

Channel geometry

Layer Channel diameter Fit type
PCCF layers (×3) 2.2 mm Sliding fit
PETG bottom layer 2.1 mm (core zone) / 2.2 mm (outer) Interference fit at core
PETG top layer 2.2 mm Sliding fit

Rod heights in sandwich

Position Height from centreline
Rod 1 (outer, FR/RR arms) +5.0 mm
Rod 2 (inner, FR/RR arms) +2.0 mm
Rod 3 (inner, LF/LR arms) −2.0 mm
Rod 4 (outer, LF/LR arms) −5.0 mm

Tension verification — acoustic ping procedure

After assembly, tap each rod with a fingernail or small tool. - Pass: clear ring tone, sustains for >0.5 seconds - Fail: dull thud — rod is slack, re-check channel interference fit and rod cut length


Procedure

Threading rods during assembly

  1. Lay all five X body layers in correct order: PETG bottom, PCCF ×3, PETG top.
  2. Align layers by eye — T-slot pockets should stack cleanly.
  3. Thread Rod 1 through the outer channel from the arm side. Use the rod tip to guide each layer into alignment as you thread.
  4. Repeat for Rods 2, 3, 4. The fourth rod locks the assembly alignment.
  5. Verify all rod ends protrude equally from both ends of the sandwich.
  6. Perform acoustic ping on each rod. All four must ring.

Rod replacement

  1. Slacken sandwich bolts — do not remove.
  2. Slide old rod out from one end.
  3. Clean channel with compressed air if necessary.
  4. Slide new rod in. Re-tension sandwich bolts to spec.
  5. Verify acoustic ping.

Rationale

Why 2 mm diameter specifically

At 330 mm wheelbase, 2 mm rods provide adequate pre-tension force without requiring excessive press-fit force in the PETG interference zone. Larger diameters (3 mm) would require proportionally larger channel walls, increasing the X body layer mass. Smaller diameters (1.5 mm) provide insufficient pre-tension at this length and are prone to permanent set.

Why four rods rather than two or six

Two rods provide good pre-tension but only a planar box-girder — poor torsional resistance. Six rods add mass and complexity without proportional structural gain at this scale. Four rods at the calculated heights form the minimum geometry for effective three-dimensional pre-tensioning of the sandwich.

Why continuous rods rather than segment-and-pin

Segmented rod systems (shorter rods with connecting pins at the X body) allow modular arm replacement but introduce compliance at the joint. Continuous rods eliminate all mid-span compliance and serve as the assembly alignment tool — a benefit that segment-and-pin cannot provide.


Connections

requires: - sandwich-structure - material-selection-philosophy related: - pccf - petg - frame-structure-overview - cf-plate-arms leads_to: - airframe-integration - cf-plate-arms